|
Texas
Public Employees Association
September 2004 State Employee Update
Contents:
•Take
Action Now to Support Pay Raises and Maintain Our Health Insurance!
•State Auditor’s Report Reveals Huge Pay
Disparity
•EMPACT, TPEA’s Affiliated Political Action
Committee, Releases Endorsements
•Austin
American-Statesman Supports State Employee Pay Raise
•ERS Budget Submission Shows Continued Rise in
Health Care Costs
Texas Public Employees Association wants state employees
to be aware of legislative activities and developments affecting your
job and career.
TPEA is sending this message to our members and to state employees who
have participated at TPEA events and given us their e-mail addresses.
TPEA also requested and received e-mail addresses as public information
from a number of state agencies.
If you do not wish to remain on this list, you
can unsubscribe by
following the instructions at the end of this email.
REMEMBER: STATE EMPLOYEES SHOULD NOT USE STATE EQUIPMENT OR STATE TIME
TO ENGAGE IN ANY TYPE OF LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY EFFORTS. This message should
not be printed, replied to, or forwarded using state equipment, unless
allowed by your agency's policies and procedures.
Take
Action Now to Support Pay Raises and Maintain Our Health Insurance!
It is vital that state employees and retirees actively work to support
pay raises and funding to maintain our health insurance benefits. Click
Here to get information to help you communicate with legislators
and state leaders.
State
Auditor’s Report Reveals Huge Pay Disparity
A new report by the State Auditor’s Office
(SAO) concludes that the State’s overall compensation system is
not competitive, and that employees’ actual pay is substantially
lower than what other public and private employers pay for comparable
work.
The primary finding of the report is “The average state employee’s
pay is 17 percent less than the pay of employees performing similar jobs
in government or private industry. In addition, the State’s compensation
system no longer provides competitive salary ranges.” In the comparable
report issued two years ago, the SAO found that actual employee pay was
14 percent below that paid for comparable work by other employers. The
report confirms what many had speculated, that the State’s salary
disparity is continuing to worsen.
The Biennial Report on the State’s Compensation System for Fiscal
Years 2006 and 2007 (Click
Here to View Report) is a statutorily required report issued
biennially. Because of changes made in the law, the report no longer includes
specific prospective recommendations for employee pay raises, as it has
in past years. However, the report clearly identifies the scope of the
problem, that the problem has been growing worse, and the consequences
for not addressing the issue.
The report also correctly notes the consequences for failing to act, “Without
changes to the compensation system, state agencies will face an increased
risk of turnover and the inability to compete for and retain qualified
employees.” State agencies have experienced excessive turnover for
a number of years, largely as the result of noncompetitive salaries. Turnover
for FY 2003, the most recent year currently available, was 17.4 percent,
a rate significantly higher than that experienced by other public and
private employers in Texas and nationally. This turnover rate is particularly
disturbing because it occurred during an economic downturn when employees
were less likely to change jobs.
The report found that the pay ranges for Schedules A and B lagged the
market by 10 percent, and law enforcement positions on Schedule C lagged
by 8 to 17 percent. Although raising state employee Salary Schedules closer
to market-competitive rates will help in recruiting new employees, it
will not adequately address the actual salary disparity for most current
employees. This is because the analysis of Schedules is based on a comparison
of mid-points in salary ranges. And, as the report found, a sizeable majority
of employees are paid below the midpoint of their pay range. Because of
a lack of appropriated funds, agencies have only been able to reward a
relatively small percentage of deserving employees with any type of merit
pay awards, only 18 percent of eligible employees received a merit increase
(13 percent) or a one-time merit award (5 percent ) in FY 2003, far below
the norm for employers generally. Although the report does not make recommendations
for across-the-board raises, as it used to, it states that the cost to
move all employees to the midpoints of their pay ranges would be $596
million per year in the next biennium. Adequate pay raises in both years
of the 2006-2007 biennium are TPEA’s top legislative priority for
the 79th legislative session.
The report also includes some information on total compensation for state
employees, this includes salary plus indirect compensation such as insurance,
retirement, vacation and sick leave. These figures are striking in two
respects. First, as the report notes, “The cost to provide health
insurance benefits to state employees increased 45 percent from fiscal
year 2000 to fiscal year 2003.” Secondly, while health care costs
spiraled up rapidly, more of the overall share of these costs was shifted
to employees. Whereas in FY 2000 state-paid contributions constituted
roughly two thirds of the total dollars spent on health care, the SAO
report projects that in FY 2005, which just began, the state-paid share
of total costs will drop to less than half the total. ERS has estimated
that the average state employee saw a $900 annual increase in out-of-pocket
health care costs based on the changes that occurred in 2003. The erosion
in the value of state health insurance benefits makes it more difficult
for agencies to attract and retain and employees, and it makes it even
more important to convince the Legislature to increase employee salaries
to help employees absorb these shifted costs.
Viewed in the context of previous State Auditor’s reports on employee
turnover, as well as the significant erosion in the value of state employee
health benefits, failure to address state employee compensation issues
will result in a further weakening of the state’s ability to attract
and retain a stable and qualified workforce resulting in hollowing out
of the state workforce, the loss of vital institutional memory, and a
deterioration in the quality of state services. TPEA is working to make
sure legislators and other state leaders are aware of this report and
the absolute necessity of providing meaningful pay raises for state employees.
EMPACT,
TPEA’s Affiliated Political Action Committee, Releases Endorsements
TPEA
has an affiliated political action committee, or PAC, that endorses candidates
and provides campaign contributions to candidates in state elections.
EMPACT is essentially the affiliated political arm of TPEA, governed by
a separate Board comprised of active and retired state employees. Click
Here to see the list of candidates EMPACT is endorsing in
Texas House and Texas Senate races this November 2.
Austin
American-Statesman Supports State Employee Pay Raises
An editorial (Click
Here to View) in the Sunday, September 19 Austin American-Statesman
provided well-reasoned support for a state employee pay raise. Citing
the State Auditor’s report on the State’s Compensation System,
rising out-of-pocket health care costs, and spiraling employee turnover,
the editorial concludes “When the Legislature convenes in January,
it should consider a state employee pay raise a must.” The piece
also quotes TPEA’s Director of Government Relations.
ERS
Budget Submission Shows Continued Rise in Health Care Costs
In
its Legislative Appropriations Request (LAR) submission to the Governor
and the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), the Employees Retirement System
(ERS) estimated the cost in new funds to maintain current health benefits
for state employees during the 2006-07 biennium at $595.9 million for
general state government and $691.4 million when including higher education
institutions under ERS.
Under the instructions provided to develop LAR submissions for the 2006-2007
biennium, agencies are required to submit a base line budget request at
95 percent of general revenue appropriations for the current 2004-2005
budget. Funding at the 95 percent level, or even level funding, “would
require significant changes to current contribution and eligibility policy,
including changes to the currently provided premium subsidies, co-payments
and other benefit changes that would increase out-of-pocket expenses for
employees.”
More simply stated, ERS continues to project growth in health care costs
of 13 percent per year during the next biennium. ERS has requested Exceptional
Item funding to maintain current benefits, which would require $691.4
million in new funds. Failure to receive sufficient new funds could require
employees to contribute more for health insurance premiums, result in
increased co-pays, deductibles or other out-of-pocket costs as occurred
during the last legislative session. TPEA is seeking to maintain the current
premium contribution policy and prevent any increases in out-of-pocket
costs.
Sign Up with An
Email Address Outside of the Office
TPEA has been building a new list of email addresses – ones that
don’t go to State computers or workplaces and instead to home and
web-based email accounts. Because you are receiving this email, we invite
you to join the new list. Signing up will ensure that TPEA can keep you
up-to-date on all issues concerning Texas State Employees. Click
here to add your email address.
If
you are agency IT staff and need to contact TPEA about technical issues
regarding this email please click here.
If
you do not wish to remain on this list, you can unsubscribe by
following the instructions at the end of this email.
|